DevNJ Make your business ease
Column /

Should You Migrate from WordPress? Decision Criteria and a Step-by-Step Migration Plan: 4 Alternatives Compared, Data Mapping, Plugin Replacement and Launch (2026)

Column › Website redesign

Should You Migrate from WordPress? Decision Criteria and a Step-by-Step Migration Plan: 4 Alternatives Compared, Data Mapping, Plugin Replacement and Launch (2026)

Requests to "get off WordPress" usually start with a concrete complaint: weekly plugin update notices, a slow site, a dashboard staff avoid, a security warning email.

But the cause is not always WordPress itself. If the problem is an old theme, too many plugins or outdated PHP, rebuilding on WordPress can be cheaper, faster and safer. If the way you use the site has drifted away from what WordPress does well, moving can make day-to-day operation lighter.

This article first checks, with primary-source figures, how widely WordPress is used and what maintenance burden it carries, then sets out the criteria for staying or moving and the steps if you move. Redirects for changed URLs are covered in detail in "Website Redesign Without Losing Rankings: A 301 Redirect Plan", and how to read a full quote in "Website Redesign Cost and How to Read a Quote".

Main sources for this article

  • W3Techs, "Usage statistics of content management systems" (as of 24 October 2026)
  • WordPress.org usage statistics (PHP and WordPress version distribution, retrieved 24 October 2026) and official documentation (export, REST API, requirements)
  • HTTP Archive, "Web Almanac 2025", CMS chapter (published January 2026)
  • PHP's supported versions table and Patchstack's "State of WordPress Security in 2026"
  • Google Search Central guidance on site moves, hreflang and JavaScript SEO; the European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882)
What this article covers Short answer
How widely is WordPress used? 39.6% of all sites, 58.3% of CMS sites (section 1)
Where is the maintenance burden? Old PHP versions and plugin vulnerabilities (section 2)
What alternatives exist? Static site generator, headless CMS, SaaS builder, custom CMS (section 3)
How do I decide? Two axes: update frequency/editors, and feature load (sections 4–5)
Where does a migration start? Inventory and mapping, then export (sections 6–9)
Multilingual content and launch? Translation map, unchanged URLs, rollback plan (sections 10–11)

1. How widely is WordPress used today?

About 40% of all sites, about 60% of CMS sites

According to W3Techs, which tracks web technologies, as of 24 October 2026 WordPress is used by 39.6% of all websites, and among sites that use a CMS (content management system) its share is 58.3%. Shopify, in second place, is used by 5.3% of all sites.

The table lists the leading figures. "No CMS" means sites using none of the systems W3Techs detects, such as hand-written HTML or in-house builds.

System Share of all websites Share of CMS sites
WordPress 39.6% 58.3%
Shopify 5.3% —
Wix 4.2% —
Squarespace 2.4% —
Joomla 1.1% —
No CMS (not detected) 32.1% —

WordPress is clearly not a niche legacy system, and more agencies, developers and documentation exist for it than for any alternative. Moving means giving up this pool of people and information too.

Share of all websites: WordPress 39.6%, no CMS 32.1%, Shopify 5.3%, Wix 4.2%, Squarespace 2.4%, Joomla 1.1%. WordPress 39.6% No CMS 32.1% Shopify 5.3% Wix 4.2% Squarespace 2.4% Joomla 1.1% 0%
Figure 1: Share of all websites using each CMS (source: W3Techs, checked 24 October 2026)

Crawl data agrees: over 60% of CMS sites run WordPress

W3Techs surveys the top 10 million sites. HTTP Archive's "Web Almanac 2025", which crawls a much wider set of sites, found that CMS-driven sites make up over 54% of observed websites, and that about 64.3% of them on mobile run WordPress. Shopify is at about 7.3%, Wix about 5.2% and Squarespace about 3%.

The methods differ, so the numbers do not match, but the conclusion is the same.

The official WordPress.org plugin directory lists 72,476 plugins as of 24 October 2026 (the result count from the WordPress.org plugin search API). The latest core release is the 7.1 branch, and WordPress.org statistics show 63.7% of active sites on 7.1. This "add anything with a plugin" model is both its greatest strength and the source of its maintenance burden.

2. Why migrations get considered: the maintenance burden in numbers

A third of sites run on unsupported PHP

WordPress runs on PHP. Each PHP version gets two years of active support, then two years of security fixes only, after which vulnerabilities are no longer fixed.

The table puts PHP's official support dates next to the PHP version distribution from WordPress.org statistics. WordPress.org recommends PHP 8.3 or greater.

PHP version Security support ends Share of WordPress sites
7.4 or older Ended (7.4: 28 Nov 2022) 20.8%
8.0 Ended (26 Nov 2023) 3.6%
8.1 Ended (31 Dec 2025) 9.8%
8.2 31 Dec 2026 23.3%
8.3 31 Dec 2027 27.2%
8.4 31 Dec 2028 10.0%
8.5 31 Dec 2029 5.3%

In total, about 34% of WordPress sites run on PHP 8.1 or older, with no security fixes. PHP 8.2, used by another 23% or so, loses fixes on 31 December 2026, after which more than half of WordPress sites will be on unsupported PHP.

Share of WordPress sites by PHP version. 7.4 or older 20.8%, 8.0 3.6% and 8.1 9.8%, all unsupported. 8.2 23.3%, support ends at the end of 2026. 8.3 27.2%, 8.4 10.0% and 8.5 5.3%, supported. 7.4 or older 20.8% 8.0 3.6% 8.1 9.8% 8.2 23.3% 8.3 27.2% 8.4 10.0% 8.5 5.3% Ended Ends end of 2026 Supported
Figure 2: PHP versions used by WordPress sites and their support status (sources: WordPress.org statistics, PHP, checked 24 October 2026)

However, old PHP is not in itself a reason to leave WordPress. Most hosts let you switch PHP in their control panel. The problem comes when old plugins or themes do not run on newer PHP; rebuilding them can be as much work as a migration.

Nine in ten vulnerabilities come from plugins

Security company Patchstack reports 11,334 new vulnerabilities in the WordPress ecosystem in 2025, up 42% from 7,966. 91% were in plugins and 9% in themes; core had six, all low priority. 46% had no developer fix at disclosure.

Patchstack sells vulnerability protection and counts the reports it collects, but the pattern is clear: risk scales with the number and quality of plugins and themes, not with core.

Measure the burden on your own site

Counting four things on your own site is more useful than general statistics. Each takes about 30 minutes.

What to measure Where to look When to consider moving
Number of active plugins Plugins screen in the dashboard Over 20, some with no known purpose
Plugins not updated in 2+ years Each plugin's WordPress.org page Even one carries a core feature
PHP version Tools → Site Health 8.2 or lower, and parts break on upgrade
Maintenance time in the last 12 months Work logs, invoices More maintenance jobs than content updates

The thresholds are based on DevNJ's experience, not an official standard. If two or more apply, the comparison below is worth your time.

3. Four alternatives, plus "rebuild on WordPress"

Five options side by side

Destinations fall into four broad types. Adding rebuilding on WordPress gives five options. They are described by type rather than product, because choosing the type first makes picking a product easier.

Option How it works Suits sites that Main weakness
Rebuild on WordPress New theme, fewer plugins Have many editors, lots of posts Maintenance remains
Static site generator HTML built in advance from source Change rarely, need speed Hard for non-technical editors
Headless CMS Editing and display separated Publish to several channels Two systems to run
SaaS website builder Built on a provider's service Staff want to edit themselves Limits on export and freedom
Custom framework-built CMS Only the features you need Are tied to business systems Dependence on developers

None of these weaknesses is fatal. What matters is whether your organisation can absorb it.

Static site generator

A static site generator (SSG) combines source text, often Markdown, with templates and builds every page as HTML before publishing. With no database read per visit, pages are fast and there are fewer entry points for attackers.

But forms, site search, member accounts and anything else that needs request-time processing must be handled by an external service or a separate program. Updates often go through Git, so an SSG does not suit sites that non-technical staff update daily.

Headless CMS

A headless CMS provides only the editing interface; the display layer is built separately, pulling content through an API for a website, an app or other screens. WordPress has a REST API, so you can also keep WordPress for editing and rebuild only the front end.

The catch is that you run two systems. Without a good preview, editors cannot see content before publishing. If the front end uses JavaScript, follow Google's JavaScript SEO guidance so search engines can read the content.

SaaS website builder

A SaaS builder lets you assemble a site visually on a provider's service, which handles servers, updates and security. It is most effective when you want to hand maintenance out of the organisation.

In exchange, you can only build what the service supports. URL structure, multilingual handling and export vary by product, and some do not allow bulk export if you move again. Check export before signing up.

Custom framework-built CMS

This means developing an admin interface with only the features you need on a framework such as Laravel, Django or Next.js. For sites tied to bookings, stock or customer records, it is often clearer than combining plugins.

But because it depends heavily on whoever built it, putting design documents, the data model and runbooks into the contract is a precondition.

4. Criteria for staying or moving

Two axes

The decision rests on two axes: who updates the site and how often, and how many features and integrations it carries. Together they form four rough quadrants.

Vertical axis: update frequency and number of editors. Horizontal axis: features and integrations. Frequent updates with few features suggests a SaaS builder; frequent updates with many features suggests staying on WordPress or a headless CMS; rare updates with few features suggests a static site generator; rare updates with many features suggests a custom framework-built CMS. SaaS builder Staff edit it themselves Keep WordPress or a headless CMS Static site A few updates a year Custom CMS Tied to business systems ↑ Frequent updates Rare updates Few features Many features →
Figure 3: A starting point for choosing a destination by update frequency/editors and feature load (by DevNJ; the boundaries are a guide, not numeric thresholds)

The quadrants are only a starting point. The top right is where WordPress is strongest; moving away there can mean building more, not less.

Eight questions

When the two axes are not enough, answering the following eight questions narrows the options.

Question Answer that favours WordPress Answer that favours moving
Who updates the site? Several non-technical staff One or two people, or developers
How often? Weekly or more Monthly or less
What features are needed? Posts, forms, search Bookings, members, integrations
How many plugins? Around 10, each with a clear role Over 20, some unexplained
Multilingual? None or up to two languages Three or more, same structure
Who maintains it? A contracted maintenance provider Nobody
Plans for three years out? More content in the same form Major changes to business or features
In-house skills? Staff familiar with WordPress Developers skilled in another stack

If the answers split evenly, it is safer not to rush. Pruning plugins, upgrading PHP and agreeing a maintenance contract often solve much of the problem.

5. Do speed and quality depend on the CMS?

Core Web Vitals pass rates differ by CMS

Let us check WordPress's reputation for slowness against data. Google's Core Web Vitals treat a page as "good" when LCP (time until the largest element appears) is 2.5 seconds or less, INP (response to interaction) is 200 milliseconds or less, and CLS (layout shift) is 0.1 or less.

The Web Almanac publishes pass rates by CMS from Chrome UX Report real-user data. The table compares 2024 and 2025 mobile figures.

CMS 2024 (mobile) 2025 (mobile)
Duda 73% 85%
Wix 57% 74%
Squarespace 60% Up (rate not stated)
Drupal 56% Up (rate not stated)
Joomla 45% Up (rate not stated)
WordPress 40% 45%

WordPress's 2025 pass rate was 45%, lower than SaaS builders Wix (74%) and Duda (85%).

Most of the gap comes from how sites are built

Reading this as "WordPress is slow" would be premature. WordPress sites vary enormously, and old themes and heavy page builders pull the average down, while SaaS providers optimise image delivery and the like for every site.

A well-built WordPress site is fast enough, and a carelessly built replacement will be slow. If speed is your reason to move, first check PageSpeed Insights to find whether images, scripts or the server are the cause. Theme or plugin problems can be fixed on WordPress.

6. The migration at a glance: six stages and timings

Export is stage three

It is tempting to start exporting straight away, but export is stage three. Until you know what moves and in what shape, you will keep reprocessing data.

1. Inventory, 1 to 2 weeks. 2. Mapping and design, 1 to 2 weeks. 3. Export and convert, 1 to 3 weeks. 4. Replace features, 2 to 4 weeks. 5. Verify and freeze, 1 week. 6. Launch and monitor, from launch day to 30 days. 1–2 wks 1. Inventory Count pages, features, data 1–2 wks 2. Mapping and design Decide data model and URLs 1–3 wks 3. Export and convert WXR, media, form data 2–4 wks 4. Replace features Move what plugins did 1 wk 5. Verify and freeze Compare, then stop edits ≤30 days 6. Launch and monitor Keep a rollback ready
Figure 4: Six stages of a WordPress migration and typical durations (for a mid-sized site with several hundred posts; based on DevNJ's working estimates)
Stage What happens Output
1. Inventory Count pages, post types, plugins and forms Inventory sheet
2. Mapping and design Match old fields to new ones Data mapping table, URL policy
3. Export and convert Extract and convert WXR, media, form data Conversion scripts and results
4. Replace features Move plugin functions to the new system Replacement table and build
5. Verify and freeze Compare old and new, stop edits Test results, freeze notice
6. Launch and monitor Switch DNS, redirects, monitoring Launch runbook, monitoring log

In migrations that go well, stages 1 and 2 take 30 to 40% of the time. Cutting them short means rework later.

7. Inventory and export: content, media, users and forms

Count first: building the inventory sheet

The inventory counts what is inside WordPress by type and decides whether each item moves, is merged or is dropped, including drafts, private items and attachment pages.

What to count Where to check What to decide
Posts and pages Dashboard lists, by status Move, merge or delete
Custom post types Dashboard menu, theme code Their type in the new system
Categories and tags Dashboard lists Which to keep or merge
Images and attachments Media Library, uploads folder What to do with unused files
Users Users list, by role Who moves and who does not
Forms and submissions Form plugins Retention and scope
Shortcodes and blocks Search the body text How to replace them

Clean up pages with no traffic and outdated content now; less to move means less testing. Record deleted URLs as redirect candidates.

Content: what WXR includes and what it does not

Tools → Export produces an XML file in WXR (WordPress eXtended RSS) format. Per the official documentation, it covers posts, pages, custom post types, comments, custom fields, categories, tags, custom taxonomies and users, and choosing "All content" also includes navigation menus. The WP-CLI command wp export produces the same format from the command line.

Item In WXR? How to get it if not
Body, title, date, URL slug Yes —
Categories, tags, custom taxonomies Yes —
Custom fields Yes Check complex nested data
The image files themselves No (URLs only) Copy the uploads folder
User passwords No Extract from the database
Theme and plugin settings No Record screens, rebuild
Form submissions Usually not Each plugin's CSV export
SEO settings (titles, descriptions) Depends on the plugin Check as custom fields

WXR is designed for WordPress-to-WordPress moves, and other systems often cannot read it. The usual approach is a script that converts it to an intermediate format such as JSON or Markdown, or pulling only the fields you need from the REST API, for example posts from /wp-json/wp/v2/posts.

Watch for WordPress-specific pieces left in the body

Block editor posts carry comments such as <!-- wp:paragraph -->, and shortcodes (square-bracket elements such as [gallery]) appear as raw text outside WordPress.

Search all body text for shortcodes, count each type and decide how to convert it: frequent ones by script, rare ones by hand.

Media: move both the files and the URLs

Copy the wp-content/uploads folder in full. WordPress generates several sizes per image, so move only the originals and let the new system generate sizes. Replace body image URLs (/wp-content/uploads/...) with new locations.

Users: passwords and personal data

Moving users needs the most care. WXR includes names and email addresses but not passwords, which must come from the database in a format that depends on the WordPress version.

WordPress version Password storage format Handling in the new system
6.7 and earlier phpass (starts with $P$) Implement compatible checks, or reset
6.8 and later bcrypt-based (starts with $wp$2y$) Same; rehashed as users log in
Either Application passwords use another format Do not move; have them reissued

From 6.8, phpass hashes are replaced as each user logs in. If the new system cannot verify either format, have users reset their password on first login, and tell them in advance.

User data is personal data. Both the EU GDPR and Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) require appropriate contracts and disclosure when entrusting it to a new service (see section 15). WordPress's Tools → Export Personal Data also helps if someone requests their data before the move.

Forms: move submissions or delete them?

Form plugins store submissions in their own tables or as posts, so they are usually not in WXR. Each plugin's CSV export gets them out, but first ask whether they need to move at all. If the history lives in email or a CRM, set a retention period and delete it instead, in line with the GDPR principle of not keeping data longer than necessary.

8. Building the data mapping table

The mapping table is the blueprint

A data mapping table lists which field in the new system each WordPress item becomes. Without one, you lose track of where information went.

WordPress item Example Field in the new system Note
Post Blog article Article type Move both published and modified dates
Page About us Page type Reflect parent/child in URLs
Custom post type Case studies Dedicated type Design fields per type
Custom field Price, location Field on the type Normalise formats (number, date)
Categories and tags News Taxonomy Decide which to merge
Featured image Post thumbnail Image field Move alt text too
Author Writer Author type Decide how to handle ex-staff
Revisions Edit history Usually not moved Export and archive if needed

Put the URL policy in the mapping table

Include columns for old URL and new URL as well. WordPress URLs are set in Permalink Settings and may contain dates (/2023/05/slug/) or categories (/category/slug/).

The safest option is not to change a single URL. Google treats this as a "site move with no URL changes", a much lighter process. Check whether each destination lets you set URL structure freely. For the steps when URLs do change, see "Website Redesign Without Losing Rankings: A 301 Redirect Plan".

Do not drop SEO data

SEO plugins often store search titles, descriptions and noindex flags in custom fields, and they vanish unless the mapping table names them. Add columns for "search title", "description", "canonical", "noindex" and "OGP image", and compare with the old site during testing.

9. Replacing plugin features

Translate plugins into features

The same components will not exist in the new system, so first write down in words what each plugin does: not "SEO plugin" but "search title settings, XML sitemap, breadcrumb structured data".

Common feature In WordPress Example replacement
Search titles, sitemap SEO plugin Template fields and auto-generation
Contact forms Form plugin External form service or own handler
Speed Caching plugin Static delivery and a CDN
Login protection Security plugin Separate admin, two-factor auth
Multilingual Multilingual plugin Per-language fields and links
Redirects Redirect plugin Server or CDN configuration
Cookie consent Consent plugin Choose a consent tool again
Backups Backup plugin Hosting backups and Git history

Find features to drop rather than replace

This reveals features the new system no longer needs: with an SSG or SaaS builder, caching and security are handled by the platform.

Conversely, some features, such as scheduled publishing, per-editor permissions, preview before publishing and site search, must be newly built in the destination.

The editing experience is part of the replacement

Most often overlooked is the editors' experience. Before migrating, have an editor write one real post in the new interface and feed back what tripped them up, so the site does not go stale after launch.

10. Migrating a multilingual site

WordPress multilingual is "each plugin's own way"

WordPress core cannot hold one post in several languages. Multilingual sites rely on plugins or Multisite (several sites from one installation), and the data model differs by approach.

Approach How data is stored What to extract
Separate post per language Translations linked by relation Posts and translation links
Several languages in one post Language delimiters in the body Split the delimiters
Multisite A separate site per language Per-site exports and links
Machine translation display Translations in an external or separate table Where they live, and rights

Whatever the approach, the key thing to carry over is which posts are translations of each other. WXR may miss plugin-specific links, so export a table of "Japanese URL | English URL | Dutch URL" first.

hreflang must point both ways

hreflang tells Google how language versions relate. Google says each version must list itself and all others, and be listed back; one-way annotations may be ignored. After launch, extract hreflang from every page and compare it with the mapping table. x-default can point unmatched users to a language selector.

11. Launch: freeze, DNS and rollback

From two weeks before to after launch day

Launch is the shortest stage and the one where failures are most visible. DevNJ usually proceeds like this.

When What to do What to check
2 weeks before Lower the DNS TTL (cache time) Current and new values
1 week before Announce the content freeze internally How to handle urgent edits
3 days before Final export and delta import Post, image and form counts
Day before Final check with production settings Redirects, hreflang, noindex
Launch day Switch DNS; keep the old site running Key pages and form submission
1–30 days after Monitor Search Console and traffic Errors, 404s, submission counts

Keep the freeze short

Anything edited on the old site after the final export will not reach the new one, so you need a content freeze. If conversion is automated with scripts, the freeze can be a few hours to a day.

Keep a rollback ready

In case of serious problems, keep the old site for a while in a state where switching DNS back brings it up immediately. While it remains, restrict access and keep it hidden from search engines.

What to watch after launch

For 30 days, check Search Console's indexing status and errors weekly. If URLs changed, keep redirects for at least one year. The most easily missed failure is form notification emails no longer arriving, so compare submission counts with the previous month.

12. Cost and time ranges

Migration work without a redesign

Cost depends less on page count than on the number of data types, features and languages. The table shows hours for migration work only, excluding redesign, based on DevNJ's working estimates. Amounts use Dutch hourly-rate surveys (freelance web developers €73, agency average €106, both excluding VAT), converted at €1 = ¥175.51 (European Central Bank reference rate, 23 October 2026).

Size Assumptions Hours Range (€) Range (¥)
Small About 30 pages, 1 language, 1 form 40–80 about 2,900–8,500 about 0.51–1.49 million
Medium Several hundred posts, 2 languages, a few forms 120–250 about 8,800–26,500 about 1.54–4.65 million
Large Members, integrations, 3+ languages 300–600 about 21,900–63,600 about 3.84–11.16 million

These ranges apply to any destination type and are not primary-source statistics. Redesign, rewriting and translation cost extra. How to read a full quote is covered in "Website Redesign Cost and How to Read a Quote".

Breakdown of the work

A typical breakdown for a medium site follows. More time on inventory and mapping makes conversion and testing more predictable.

Task Hours (medium site) Grows when
Inventory and mapping 16–32 Many custom post types
Export and conversion scripts 24–48 Many shortcodes
Replacing features 32–80 Bookings, members and similar
Multilingual links 16–32 Translation links are broken
Testing and redirects 16–32 URLs change
Launch and monitoring 16–26 A very short freeze is required

Compare running costs over three to five years, not just upfront cost: hosting, plugin licences and maintenance for WordPress; monthly fees for SaaS; update effort and developer time for a static site or custom CMS. Check amounts against pricing pages and maintenance quotes.

13. Common mistakes

Eight mistakes that often happen

Failures come less from technical difficulty than from checking things in the wrong order. These are the most common in DevNJ's experience.

Mistake What happens How to prevent it
Starting with the export Conversion is redone repeatedly Build the inventory and mapping first
Missing shortcodes Square-bracket text shows in posts Search and count all body text
Not moving SEO settings Search titles disappear Give them their own mapping columns
Losing image alt text Accessibility drops Move alt text as a field
Broken translation links hreflang goes wrong Build a per-language URL table
Form notifications stop Enquiries are missed Send a test on launch day
Deleting the old site at once No way back if problems appear Keep it, hidden, for a while
Editors cannot use the new system Updates stop after launch Have them write a test post first

14. Example cases (fictional)

The following are fictional examples to make the reasoning concrete. They are not real companies.

Case 1: A manufacturer's company site updated a few times a year

A Japanese parts manufacturer runs a Japanese–English site of about 25 pages for European customers, updated three or four times a year. It had 18 plugins and was stuck on PHP 8.1.

With few updates and only a contact form, the company moved to a static site generator and handled the form with an external service. URLs did not change.

Case 2: A restaurant group posting every week

A company with three restaurants in the Netherlands updates news and menus weekly in Japanese, English and Dutch. Three managers, all comfortable with WordPress, do the updates.

The complaint was slowness, but the cause was a heavy page builder and large photos. The company rebuilt on WordPress and cut its plugins to eight. Keeping the dashboard the managers already knew was the deciding factor.

Case 3: A language school with bookings and members

A language school in The Hague ran bookings, members and payments through several plugins. Conflicts kept causing double bookings that its maintenance provider could not diagnose.

The school rebuilt bookings and members on a custom framework-built CMS. Rather than implementing compatible password checks, it emailed members in advance and had them reset their password on first login.

Case Decision Deciding factor
1. Manufacturer's company site Static site generator Few updates, only a form
2. Restaurant group Rebuild on WordPress Keeps the dashboard editors know
3. Language school with bookings Custom CMS Business features at the core, ongoing conflicts

15. What changes for sites serving both Japan and Europe

Law and where data lives

For sites aimed at both Japan and Europe, check the law and where data is stored when choosing a destination.

Item Japan Europe (EU, Netherlands)
Personal data law APPI GDPR
Entrusting to a provider Supervise the contractor; Article 28 rules for foreign providers Processor contract (Article 28)
Transfers abroad Rules on provision to third parties in foreign countries Conditions such as adequacy (Japan has an adequacy decision)
Accessibility Reasonable accommodation under the Act on the Elimination of Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities European Accessibility Act (applies from 28 June 2025)

Japan's Personal Information Protection Commission notes that entrusting personal data to a business abroad can fall under the rules on provision to third parties in foreign countries. Before moving to a SaaS platform or overseas form service, check where the provider handles data.

Does the European Accessibility Act apply?

The European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) has applied since 28 June 2025 to services such as e-commerce for EU consumers. Service microenterprises (fewer than 10 staff and turnover or balance sheet of €2 million or less) are exempt.

Japanese businesses selling online to EU consumers can be covered too. Whether a destination can deliver headings, alt text and keyboard operation in line with W3C's WCAG 2.2 is part of the choice. For the Netherlands, see the government portal business.gov.nl.

16. Pre-migration checklist

Deciding

  • Counted active plugins and plugins not updated for two years or more
  • Checked the PHP version and what breaks when it is raised
  • Wrote down who updates the site and how often
  • Compared running costs over three to five years

Preparing

  • Built an inventory sheet and decided what moves, merges or goes
  • Added columns for SEO settings and alt text to the data mapping table
  • Added old and new URL columns and decided whether URLs change
  • Turned translation links into a per-language URL table
  • Confirmed the destination can export your content

Launching

  • Prepared password-reset notices for users (if you have members)
  • Lowered the DNS TTL two weeks in advance
  • Sent a test form submission and confirmed the notification email arrived
  • Kept the old site hidden and wrote down the rollback steps
  • Scheduled 30 days of Search Console monitoring

Summary

  • WordPress runs 39.6% of all websites and 58.3% of CMS sites; leaving it is not a goal in itself
  • The maintenance burden sits in unsupported PHP (about 34% of WordPress sites) and plugins, which account for 91% of vulnerabilities
  • The two decision axes are update frequency/editors and feature load. If the answers split evenly, tidy up on WordPress first
  • Migrate in the order inventory → mapping → export. WXR does not include image files, settings, form submissions or passwords
  • Translate plugins into features before replacing them, and separate features you can drop from features you must build
  • For multilingual sites, tabulate translation links and check reciprocal hreflang on every page
  • At launch, make unchanged URLs the first priority, keep the freeze short and keep a rollback ready

Sources

Usage statistics

Official WordPress documentation

PHP and security

Search and performance

Law and accessibility

Cost calculation

All sources were checked on 24 October 2026. Usage statistics differ in scope and method between surveys, so the figures do not match. The cost and time tables, decision thresholds, and Figures 3 and 4 are DevNJ's estimates based on the sources above and Dutch hourly-rate surveys (covered in Website Redesign Cost and How to Read a Quote); they are not statistics. Legal treatment depends on your business, so consult a professional before signing.

FAQ

When should a business move away from WordPress to another CMS?
When who updates the site and how many features it carries no longer match what WordPress is good at. For example, the site is updated a few times a year but plugin updates and security fixes take time every month, or integrations with business systems are being forced through a stack of plugins. A site where several editors publish every week is often better off rebuilt on WordPress.
Can I export all my WordPress posts and images at once?
Tools → Export in the dashboard writes posts, pages, custom post types, comments, custom fields, categories, tags and menus to an XML file in a format called WXR. It does not include the image files themselves, theme or plugin settings, or form submissions. Copy the uploads folder separately and use each form plugin's own export for submissions.
Can I move member passwords to the new system?
WXR does not contain passwords, so they have to be taken from the database. WordPress 6.8 and later store them in a bcrypt-based format (starting with $wp$2y$); earlier versions use phpass (starting with $P$). If the new system cannot verify these formats, members will need to reset their password on first login.
Will migrating from WordPress hurt my search rankings?
If you replace the system without changing URLs, Google treats it as a site move with no URL changes, and the impact can be kept small. If URLs change, you need steps such as keeping 301 redirects from old to new URLs for at least a year. Either way, titles, body text, internal links and structured data must survive the migration.
How much does a WordPress migration cost and how long does it take?
For migration work alone, without a redesign, DevNJ's working estimates are 40 to 80 hours for a small site of about 30 pages and 120 to 250 hours for a bilingual site with several hundred posts. At Dutch hourly rates of €73 to €106, that is roughly €2,900 to €8,500 and €8,800 to €26,500. Allow 4 to 6 weeks and 2 to 4 months respectively.
What should I watch for when migrating a multilingual WordPress site?
WordPress core has no built-in way to hold one post in several languages; multilingual sites rely on plugins or Multisite. Before migrating, export a table showing which posts are translations of each other. After launch, check on every page that hreflang annotations point to each other in both directions.

Planning a site that has to work in both markets?

Get in touch

Contents