DevNJ Make your business ease
Column /

Website Redesign Cost and How to Read a Quote: Japanese and Dutch Survey Data, 11 Line Items Explained, and Where Extra Costs Appear (2026)

Column › Website redesign

Website Redesign Cost and How to Read a Quote: Japanese and Dutch Survey Data, 11 Line Items Explained, and Where Extra Costs Appear (2026)

Say you ask three agencies to quote for a redesign and get back ¥800,000, ¥2.4 million and ¥4.5 million. In most cases none of them is too high or too low. The three agencies are quoting for different jobs.

What a website costs depends less on the number of pages than on what is done and how far it goes. Putting quotes side by side when their scope differs is not a comparison.

This article first checks which surveys the commonly quoted price figures come from, and sets Japanese and Dutch (European) figures side by side in yen and euros. It then explains how to read 11 line items that appear in redesign quotes, how to compare quotes, and where extra costs tend to appear. Whether you need a redesign at all is covered in "10 Signs You Need a Website Redesign".

Main sources for this article

  • Web Kanji (Utill Inc.), "Average website production cost", published 30 May 2024 (n=846)
  • JetB Inc. (Yuryo WEB) phone and email surveys of web agencies (published 19 April and 6 August 2024)
  • Knab "Zzp Uurtarievenboekje 2026", Freelance.nl "Freelance Markt Index" and Simplicate "Benchmark report Agencies Q4 2025" (Netherlands)
  • Google Search Central on site moves, W3C's WCAG 2.2, the European Commission on the European Accessibility Act, and the Dutch Tax Administration (Belastingdienst) on VAT
What this article covers Short answer
Typical cost in Japan Mean ¥825k, median ¥434k (order data); mean ~¥1.1m (agency survey) (sections 1–2)
Typical cost in the Netherlands Per hour: freelance €73, agency €106 (section 3)
Comparing yen and euros Convert a budget into hours of work (section 4)
What to read in a quote Quantity, unit and exclusions for 11 items (sections 5–10)
Where extra costs appear Migration, redirects, languages, accessibility, maintenance (section 12)

1. Where the market figures come from

"Market price" depends on who counted what

Trace the figures in articles about website costs and most lead back to the same few surveys. And each survey counts something different.

A survey that totals orders placed through a matching service shows what buyers paid. A survey that asks agencies for their prices shows what sellers quote. The table lists the surveys used in this article by subject and method.

Survey Subject Method Main figures
Web Kanji (Japan) 846 new builds via matching Order data Mean ¥825k, median ¥434k
JetB, Yuryo WEB (Japan) 106 agencies Phone and email Mean ~¥1.1m
JetB, corporate sites (Japan) 116 agencies Same Mean ~¥1.255m
Knab (Netherlands) Self-employed (zzp) Hourly-rate survey Web developer €73 (ex VAT)
Freelance.nl (Netherlands) 40,000+ assignments Offered rates Average of 22 fields €86.36
Simplicate (Netherlands) Agencies, 5–110 FTE Customer data Average base rate €106

The Japanese surveys report project totals and the Dutch surveys report hourly rates. That reflects how differently quotes are framed in the two countries, which sections 3 and 4 look at in detail.

There are no official statistics for redesigns

Neither Japan nor the Netherlands appears to publish official statistics on website redesign costs specifically. The Web Kanji figures cover new builds, and the JetB figures do not separate redesigns from new sites.

This article uses the figures above as a reference for what building one website costs, and covers the items a redesign adds separately in section 8.

2. Japan: why the mean is twice the median

In order data, more than half cost ¥500,000 or less

The Web Kanji survey totals 846 new-site orders placed through the service between January 2022 and December 2023. The mean was ¥825,000 (about €4,690) and the median ¥434,000 (about €2,470). The mean is about 1.9 times the median because a small number of large projects pull it up.

Price band Share
¥500k or less 57%
¥510k–1m 23%
¥1.01m–2m 13%
¥2.01m–3m 3%
Over ¥3m 4%

Eight in ten orders were ¥1 million (about €5,680) or less, but 7% were above ¥2 million. Budgeting on the ¥825,000 mean alone gives too much for a small site and too little for a multilingual or feature-rich one. Corporate sites made up 46.6% of orders, so the data mainly reflects small and medium-sized businesses.

Agencies surveyed quote about ¥1.1 million on average

JetB Inc. asked web agencies listed on its directory, Yuryo WEB, about their prices by phone and email between October 2023 and April 2024. Across 106 valid responses, the overall mean was about ¥1.1 million (about €6,250). The lowest price started at around ¥30,000 and the highest was ¥6.5 million.

In a corporate-site survey of 116 agencies, the mean was ¥1,255,345 (about €7,130) and the most common band was ¥500,000 to ¥1.5 million. Landing pages (46 agencies) averaged ¥460,000 and recruiting sites (32 agencies) about ¥1.09 million. The chart below sets the Japanese figures side by side.

Web Kanji order data: median 434,000 yen, mean 825,000 yen. JetB agency survey: landing page mean 460,000 yen, recruiting site mean about 1.09 million yen, overall mean about 1.1 million yen, corporate site mean about 1.255 million yen. Web Kanji median (orders) ¥434k JetB landing page mean ¥460k Web Kanji mean (orders) ¥825k JetB recruiting site mean ~¥1.09m JetB overall mean ~¥1.1m JetB corporate site mean ~¥1.255m Orders = what buyers paid; JetB = agency prices
Figure 1: Japanese website cost surveys (sources: Web Kanji, 30 May 2024, JetB, 19 April 2024, JetB, 6 August 2024; checked 22 October 2026)

Why the two surveys disagree

The Web Kanji mean of ¥825,000 and the JetB mean of about ¥1.1 million are about ¥275,000 apart. Neither is wrong. They are counting different things.

Difference Web Kanji JetB
Whose figure What buyers paid What agencies charge
Subject 846 new-build orders 106 listed agencies
Period Jan 2022–Dec 2023 Oct 2023–Apr 2024
Possible bias Buyers who use a matching service Agencies listed in its directory
Tax Not stated Not stated

Neither represents Japan as a whole, and neither says whether figures include tax. Japanese consumption tax is 10%, which is ¥100,000 on a ¥1 million project, so put quotes on the same tax basis before comparing.

A practical reading: for a small or medium company site, many projects fall between ¥500,000 and ¥1.5 million (about €2,840–8,520). A quote far outside that range is a prompt to check how its scope differs.

3. Netherlands and Europe: priced by the hour, not the project

In the Netherlands, the hourly rate comes first

Dutch agencies and freelancers usually lead with an hourly rate (uurtarief). The total follows from the hours estimated for each task, and industry surveys report rates rather than project totals. All figures below exclude Dutch VAT (BTW).

Survey Subject Per hour (€) In yen (approx.)
Knab 2026 Freelance web developers 73 ¥12,850
Knab 2026 All self-employed 83 ¥14,610
Freelance.nl Q2 2025 Offered rates, 22 fields 86.36 ¥15,200
Simplicate Q4 2025 Agency average base rate 106 ¥18,650
Simplicate Q4 2025 Top 20% of agencies 120 ¥21,120

Yen figures use the European Central Bank reference rate for 22 October 2026 (€1 = ¥175.97).

Hourly rates excluding VAT: freelance web developers 73 euros, all self-employed 83 euros, Freelance.nl average offered rate 86.36 euros, agency average base rate 106 euros, top 20 percent of agencies 120 euros. Freelance web developer (Knab) €73 All self-employed (Knab) €83 Offered rate (Freelance.nl) €86.36 Agency average (Simplicate) €106 Top 20% of agencies €120 All per hour, excluding VAT (BTW)
Figure 2: Hourly rates for web work in the Netherlands (sources: Knab, Freelance.nl, Simplicate Q4 2025; checked 22 October 2026)

The Dutch surveys disagree too

The €73 for freelance web developers and the €106 for agencies are about 1.45 times apart. Again, the subjects differ.

Difference Knab Freelance.nl Simplicate
Whose figure Self-reported by freelancers Rates offered by clients Agencies' base rates
Role Web developer figure given Average of 22 fields Agencies overall
Coverage Survey respondents 40,000+ jobs over 4 years Customers, 5–110 FTE

Agency rates are higher because they cover a team of project managers, designers and developers, plus sales and overheads. In Simplicate's data, small, medium and large agencies averaged €103, €106 and €108, so agency size makes little difference. Freelance.nl reports that annual rate growth slowed from 5% to 2% after stricter enforcement of the Wet DBA, the Dutch law on assessing whether self-employment is genuine.

This research found no survey of European agency project totals with a disclosed method and sample size. Most total-cost ranges in English-language articles describe the US market or have no clear source, so this article does not give a European project total. Check both the hourly rate and the hours, and multiply them to verify the total.

VAT is 21%, but it depends on the customer

The standard Dutch VAT (BTW) rate is 21%. Between Dutch businesses, a €106 rate becomes €128.26 an hour.

However, the Dutch Tax Administration (Belastingdienst) says services to businesses in other EU countries are generally taxed in the customer's country and invoiced without Dutch VAT, marked "btw verlegd" (VAT reverse-charged). Many services to businesses outside the EU are also taxed in the customer's country. A Japanese company hiring a Dutch agency directly will often receive an invoice without Dutch VAT, but there are exceptions, and Japanese consumption tax must be checked separately (section 14).

4. Comparing yen and euros

Convert the budget into hours

Converting Japanese and Dutch quote totals into one currency tells you little, because labour costs and scope differ. A more useful approach is to ask how many hours of work a budget buys.

Japanese figure Yen In euros At agency €106 At freelance €73
Web Kanji median ¥434k ~€2,470 ~23 hours ~34 hours
Web Kanji mean ¥825k ~€4,690 ~44 hours ~64 hours
JetB overall mean ~¥1.1m ~€6,250 ~59 hours ~86 hours
JetB corporate mean ~¥1.255m ~€7,130 ~67 hours ~98 hours

Conversions use the reference rate for 22 October 2026 (€1 = ¥175.97), and rates exclude VAT. The Japanese surveys do not state their tax basis, so treat the hours as approximate.

The median Japanese budget buys roughly three days of a Dutch agency's time. If you approach a European agency with Japanese price expectations, the scopes may not meet. Conversely, when explaining a European quote to a head office in Japan, show the hourly rate and the hours separately.

For freelancers, check how many hours a week they can give

Knab's survey found that freelance web developers bill 22 hours a week on average, fewer than the 28 hours for all self-employed people. A 100-hour project for one freelancer is four to five weeks of billable time alone. Even at a lower rate, check the timeline and who covers holidays or illness.

Allow for exchange-rate movements

Between 1 July and 22 October 2026, the ECB reference rate moved between ¥175.97 and ¥186.99 per euro, a range of about 6%. ¥825,000 converts to anywhere from about €4,690 to about €4,410. If a euro quote is approved against a yen budget, allow for a few percent of movement before payment, and state in the contract which currency applies and who bears the exchange risk.

5. The 11 line items: an overview

Read the work, unit and price rather than the label

Line-item names vary between agencies. Ignore the label and read what work you are paying for, in what unit, and how much. This article groups redesign quotes into 11 items. The diagram below shows where they sit in the project.

Phase 1, plan: project management and scope. Phase 2, design: information architecture and visual design. Phase 3, build: development, CMS, content migration and languages. Phase 4, launch: redirects and the care plan. Licences, accessibility and SEO span all phases. 1. Plan Project mgmt Scope 2. Design Structure Visual 3. Build Dev, CMS Content, i18n 4. Launch Redirects Care plan Licences, accessibility, SEO: all phases
Figure 3: Redesign phases and the 11 quote line items. The highlighted Build phase is where extra costs most often appear (created by DevNJ, 22 October 2026)

The 11 items

Item Main contents Common unit If missing
Project management Planning, meetings, QA % of total / hours You end up coordinating
Planning and structure Requirements, sitemap, wireframes Fixed / hours Decisions made mid-build
Visual design Home and inner-page designs Templates / revisions Each revision costs extra
Development HTML, CSS, JavaScript, forms Pages / templates Testing scope unclear
CMS WordPress setup, editing screens Fixed / features Your team cannot edit
Content migration Copy, images, PDFs Pages / items Your team moves it by hand
Multilingual Translation, switcher, hreflang Words / pages One language goes stale
SEO migration URL map, redirects, analytics Fixed / URLs Lost rankings and links
Accessibility Target, testing, fixes Fixed / pages Rework after launch
Maintenance and hosting Server, updates, backups Monthly / yearly Site stalls after launch
Licences CMS, plugins, fonts, photos Yearly / one-off Features stop on expiry

The right-hand column is what to look for when checking whether anything is missing. The following sections take the items in turn.

6. Project management, planning and design

Project management: if it is a percentage, ask what it covers

Project management covers planning, meetings, scheduling and quality checks. Japanese quotes often show it as a percentage of the production fee. Check how many meetings, whose reviews and how much coordination it includes. Dutch agencies usually estimate "projectmanagement" in hours; check the assumed hours and what happens if they run over.

Planning and structure: cut it now, pay later

Planning includes requirements (what the site is for and what visitors should do), a sitemap and wireframes (the skeleton of each page). A quote without it looks cheaper, but decisions get made during the build, which causes rework. In a redesign especially, unless planning decides which old pages to keep, merge or remove, migration and redirects cannot be estimated.

Visual design: read it by template, not by page

Design is usually priced by the number of page templates, not pages. Pages that share a template need only one design, however many there are. Check how many templates, how many revision rounds are included and whether one or several concepts are presented. If a quote says "pages × unit price", ask whether pages that share a template are charged design fees too.

7. Development, CMS and licences

Development: get the test environments and speed targets in writing

Development turns the design into working HTML, CSS and JavaScript. The easily missed point is which browsers and devices will be tested. If that is not written down, fixing a layout bug after launch can turn into an argument about whether it is maintenance or extra work. Set a speed target here too. Google's Core Web Vitals define good as LCP 2.5 seconds or less, INP 200 milliseconds or less and CLS 0.1 or less, at the 75th percentile of users.

CMS: who can edit what matters more than setup cost

With an existing CMS (content management system) such as WordPress, the cost is mainly installation and building editing screens for your team. WordPress itself is distributed under the GPL (GNU General Public License) version 2 or later, so there is no licence fee. Ask for "CMS setup" to be broken down into which screens let whom edit what.

Also check the server's PHP version. According to PHP's official site, security support for PHP 8.2 ends on 31 December 2026, for 8.3 on 31 December 2027 and for 8.4 on 31 December 2028. Check that the quote does not leave you needing a PHP upgrade straight after launch.

Licences: whose name, and until when

Licences are easy to overlook and tend to cause trouble after launch.

Item Common model What to check
CMS core WordPress is free under the GPL For a paid CMS, the annual fee and account holder
Paid themes and plugins Annual renewal licences What breaks if a renewal lapses
Web fonts Google Fonts use open licences Account holder and fee for paid fonts
Photos and illustrations Stock image licences Permitted uses and licensee
Maps, booking and other services Monthly or usage-based Spending cap and account holder

Google says most Google Fonts are released under open licences such as the SIL Open Font License and can be used free of charge on commercial sites. But if paid fonts or annual plugins are licensed in the agency's name, they can stop working when the contract ends. The safe approach is to license them in your own name, or have the contract describe how licences will be transferred.

8. Content migration, SEO migration and redirects

These are the two costs a redesign adds

Compared with a new build, a redesign mainly adds moving the old site's content and moving its search value. Both grow with the number of pages on the old site.

Content migration: method and volume set the cost

Content migration moves the old site's copy, images, PDFs and articles to the new site. The method has the biggest effect on cost. Between the same CMS, much of it can be moved in bulk. From static HTML or a custom CMS, it is page by page, and the number of items becomes the number of hours. If the quote just says "content migration", always check how many pages or items are included. Without a cap, "more than expected" can become an extra charge midway.

SEO migration: everything starts from the URL map

If URLs change and you do not set up redirects from old to new URLs, you lose search rankings and the value of links from other sites. The table translates Google Search Central's site-move guidance into what it means for a quote.

Google's guidance What it means for the quote
Map old URLs to new URLs Is creating the URL map included?
Use permanent redirects such as 301 or 308 Are they set up server-side?
Keep redirects for at least a year Who pays for the old domain and server?
Do not send many old URLs to one irrelevant URL Are destinations set for removed pages?
Expect temporary ranking fluctuation Is a post-launch check period included?

Google says that for a small to medium-sized site, it can take a few weeks for most pages to move. Check whether the quote includes monitoring in Search Console for a few weeks after launch. If the domain changes, count renewing the old domain as a post-launch cost so that redirects can run for a year or more. Also check that Google Analytics (GA4) tracking and key events are set up again on the new site with the same definitions.

9. Multilingual sites and accessibility

Multilingual: translation and the mechanism are separate costs

A multilingual site has two kinds of cost: translation and the mechanism for switching languages. If a quote says "multilingual support", ask for them to be separated.

Cost type Contents Common unit
Translation Translating and proofreading copy Words / characters / pages
Localisation Formats, currency, dates, examples Hours / pages
Mechanism Language switcher, URL design, CMS setup Fixed
Search settings hreflang, sitemaps per language Fixed
Ongoing Translating each update Monthly / words

Google asks sites to describe language versions with hreflang. Each language version must point to itself and to every other version, and one-way references may be ignored. Because this must change whenever pages are added or removed, check that the CMS outputs it automatically. It is also easy to forget that every update needs translating after launch. Agree who translates updates and at what rate, so the language versions do not drift apart.

Accessibility: no target, no estimate

Accessibility (making the site usable regardless of disability or circumstances) cannot be estimated until you decide which standard to meet. The international standard is W3C's WCAG 2.2, usually at conformance level AA.

In the EU, the European Accessibility Act has applied since 28 June 2025 and covers consumer services such as e-commerce. According to the European Commission, services provided by microenterprises with fewer than 10 employees are exempt. The Dutch government portal business.gov.nl requires businesses in scope to publish an accessibility statement, and ACM (the Authority for Consumers and Markets) supervises e-commerce.

Stated in the quote? Meaning
Target standard (e.g. WCAG 2.2 AA) Defines when the work is done
Test method (automated, manual, user testing) W3C says automated tools alone cannot decide
Pages tested All pages or representative ones

10. Maintenance and hosting: costs after launch

Do not compare launch costs alone

A common mistake is to compare only the upfront cost and ignore post-launch costs. What a care plan includes varies widely. Check whether each item below is included, charged separately or left to you.

Care item Contents What to check
Server and domain Contracts and renewals Whose name they are in
CMS and plugin updates Core and extension updates Frequency, and what happens if one breaks
Platform updates such as PHP Upgrades before end of support Included monthly or quoted separately
Backups Regular backups and restores Whether restores are tested
Monitoring and incidents Detecting and fixing outages Response hours (weekdays only?)
Small edits Text and image changes Hours or requests per month

A monthly fee may cover small updates while larger work such as a PHP upgrade is quoted separately. To compare upfront and ongoing costs together, add them up over three or five years.

11. Quote formats: lump sum, itemised, fixed price, time and materials

Four formats and when each fits

Quotes come in four broad formats. In Japan you will hear "isshiki" (a lump sum per item) and "tsumiage" (itemised hours). In the Netherlands, "vaste prijs" (fixed price) and "nacalculatie" (time and materials) are common.

Format Feature Suits Watch out for
Lump sum One total per item Small, clear scope Hard to compare contents
Itemised Hours × rate per item Medium to large Ask how hours were estimated
Fixed price Total promised for a scope Scope known upfront Everything outside is extra
Time and materials Actual hours × rate Unclear scope, ongoing work Set a cap and reporting rhythm

A fixed price makes budgeting easier, but agencies tend to price in uncertainty or define scope narrowly. Time and materials is flexible, but without a cap and regular reporting of hours used, you may only find out at the end that the budget is gone.

Japanese contracts: ukeoi or jun-inin

In Japan, liability depends on whether the contract is ukeoi (a contract for work) or jun-inin (quasi-mandate). Under the Civil Code, ukeoi (Article 632) promises completion of the work, while jun-inin (Article 656) promises performing the tasks. Under ukeoi, if the deliverable does not conform to the contract, the client can demand repair or a price reduction, but under Article 637 the client must give notice within one year of becoming aware of the non-conformity. This is where post-launch bug fixes divide between "maintenance" and "non-conformity". The Information-technology Promotion Agency's (IPA) model contracts for information systems, which split contracts by phase (for example, jun-inin up to design and ukeoi for the build), are a useful reference.

12. Where extra costs appear

Extra costs come from work outside the scope

Most extra costs are not the agency raising its price later. They arise when work outside the original scope becomes necessary. The diagram follows the project timeline.

Five points: pages or features added after scope is agreed, too many design revision rounds, copy and images migrated by hand, redirects or translations added before launch, and changes outside the care plan after launch. Scope Pages or features added Agree a change rate and sign-off first Design Too many revisions Involve all reviewers from the start Migration Content moved by hand State a cap and a per-item rate Pre-launch Redirects or translation Fix URL map and languages in planning Post-launch Work outside care plan Write down what the fee covers
Figure 4: Five points where extra costs often appear, and what to agree in advance (created by DevNJ, 22 October 2026)

Causes and prevention

Point Common cause Prevention
Added after scope Another department asks late Include them in scope sign-off
Too many revisions Reviewers join midway Name one final decision-maker
Manual migration Old pages never counted Attach a list of content to migrate
Late redirects or translation Gaps noticed just before launch Fix URL map and languages in planning
Work outside care plan Unclear what the fee covers Write monthly hours or requests into the contract

The common thread is that decisions put off become extra costs. Agree before signing what rate applies to out-of-scope work and who approves it, and most overruns can be prevented. No public survey gives a percentage for contingency, so if you hold one back, base it on your own past projects.

13. How to compare quotes

Align the request before comparing

The most important step is to give every agency the same brief.

  1. List the old site's pages: URL, page type, and whether to keep, merge or remove each one
  2. Write down goals and priorities: more enquiries, recruitment, reaching European customers, and so on
  3. Decide which of the 11 items you need: languages, accessibility target, migration volume
  4. List what your team will do: copy, photos, translation review
  5. Send the same brief to about three agencies: and share answers to questions with all of them
  6. Rearrange the quotes into the 11-item table: make gaps (exclusions) visible
  7. Compare three- to five-year totals: upfront plus maintenance

A comparison template

A table like this one makes missing items obvious (example entries).

Item Agency A Agency B Agency C
Project management 6 meetings Not stated Time and materials
Content migration Up to 50 pages Not stated All pages
Redirects Included Not included Included
Multilingual 2 languages, translation extra Not stated 2 languages incl. translation
Accessibility WCAG 2.2 AA "Considered" WCAG 2.2 AA
Care plan contents Updates + 2 hours Updates only Updates + monitoring

Every "not stated" or "not included" is a likely extra cost. A quote that looks cheap is usually one with many gaps. Ask for the gaps to be filled, then compare prices.

14. Where Japanese and Dutch quotes differ

Tax, invoices and business practice

Quotes, invoices and the rules around commissioning work differ between Japan and the Netherlands.

Topic Japan Netherlands
Tax rate Consumption tax 10% BTW 21% (standard rate)
Invoice rules Qualified invoice with registration number KvK (Chamber of Commerce) and VAT numbers, etc.
Invoicing foreign businesses Depends on the transaction Many B2B services outside the EU taxed in customer's country
Quote unit Totals and lump sums common Hourly rate × hours common
Hiring individuals Freelance Act requires written terms Watch the Wet DBA self-employment test

Japanese laws for clients

Japan's Freelance Act (Act on Ensuring Proper Transactions Involving Specified Entrusted Business Operators) took effect on 1 November 2024. When commissioning an individual who has no employees, the client must immediately state the work, fee and payment date in writing or by email, and pay within 60 days of receiving the deliverable, as soon as possible within that period. From 1 January 2026, the Subcontract Act was replaced by the Act on Proper Transactions with Small and Medium Entrusted Businesses (the "Toriteki Act"), which adds employee-count thresholds and widens its scope. Check the Japan Fair Trade Commission's materials to see whether your commissions are covered.

Commissioning across borders

Across borders, the same quote total can mean a different amount paid and different tax procedures. The Dutch Tax Administration says many services to businesses outside the EU are taxed in the customer's country, and Japan's National Tax Agency sets out consumption tax treatment of cross-border services by type. Both have exceptions, so check the tax treatment in both countries with a tax adviser before signing, and ask for the quote to state which country's tax applies and whether amounts include it.

15. Example cases (fictional)

The following are fictional businesses, not real companies or projects.

Case A: a Japanese professional-services firm, 20-page company site

Rearranging three quotes into the 11-item table showed that the cheapest one left out content migration and redirects. The old site had 30 articles that drew search traffic, and changing their URLs without moving them would lose that traffic. The sensible step is to request new quotes that include migration and redirects, then compare.

Case B: a Japanese trading company in the Netherlands, two-language site

A Dutch agency quoted €110 an hour plus itemised hours, and the head office in Japan saw the total as expensive. At €110, a €10,000 budget (about ¥1.76 million) buys about 91 hours. The effective approach is to show that the rate is close to Simplicate's average (€106), then explain how many hours each item takes. If translation is done in-house, those hours could also be negotiated out.

Case C: a Japanese retailer selling online to the EU

With 30 employees, the company does not qualify for the European Accessibility Act's microenterprise exemption. The quote's "accessibility support" turned out to be automated checks only, with no target standard. The brief should be revised to target WCAG 2.2 AA, include manual testing and an accessibility statement, and every agency asked to requote on the same basis.

16. Checklist

When you receive a quote, check the following.

  • It states whether amounts include tax, and which country's tax
  • For euro quotes, the hourly rate and hours are shown separately
  • Project management states the number of meetings or the scope
  • Planning deliverables (sitemap, wireframes, URL map) are listed
  • Design states the number of templates and revision rounds
  • Test environments, and who can edit what in the CMS, are stated
  • Content migration states a cap or "all items"
  • Multilingual work states the languages and whether translation is included
  • Redirects and the URL map are included
  • Accessibility states a target standard and a test method
  • The care plan contents and licence holders are stated
  • The rate and approval process for out-of-scope work are agreed
  • You compared three- to five-year totals and, if cross-border, checked tax

Summary

  • In Japan, website builds cost a mean of ¥825,000 and a median of ¥434,000 in order data, and a mean of about ¥1.1 million in an agency survey. The surveys measure different things and do not agree
  • In the Netherlands, prices are per hour: €73 for freelance web developers and €106 on average for agencies (excluding VAT)
  • Do not compare converted totals across yen and euros; convert a budget into hours of work
  • Read a quote for the quantity and unit of each of the 11 items and what is not included
  • Extra costs most often come from migration, redirects, languages, accessibility and maintenance. Agree the rate and approval process for out-of-scope work before signing
  • Compare by sending the same brief, rearranging quotes into the 11-item table, and adding up three to five years

Sources

Japanese cost surveys

Dutch rate surveys and exchange rates

Search, speed, languages and accessibility

CMS and licences

Tax, invoices and contracts

All sources were checked on 22 October 2026. The cost surveys cover buyers or agencies using each provider's service and do not represent the whole market. Tax and legal treatment depends on the transaction, so check with a professional before signing. Figures 3 and 4 were created by DevNJ from the sources above and contain no figures.

FAQ

How much does a website redesign cost?
In Japan, 846 new-build orders placed through the Web Kanji matching service had a mean of ¥825,000 (about €4,690) and a median of ¥434,000 (about €2,470). A survey of 106 agencies found a mean of about ¥1.1 million. The figures differ because the surveys measure different things, and there are no official statistics for redesigns specifically. Compare quotes for the same scope.
Should I use the mean or the median as my benchmark?
Use whichever is closer to your project. In the Web Kanji data, the mean of ¥825,000 is almost twice the median of ¥434,000 because a few large projects pull the mean up. For a small company site, the median is the better reference. For multilingual or feature-rich sites, the mean or higher price bands are.
How much does a Dutch web agency charge?
In the Netherlands, prices are usually discussed per hour rather than per project. Simplicate's data puts the average agency base rate at €106 an hour (Q4 2025), and Knab's survey puts freelance web developers at €73, both excluding VAT. Check the total by multiplying the rate by the hours in the quote.
What should I check first in a website quote?
What is missing. Content migration, redirects from old URLs, multilingual work, accessibility and post-launch maintenance are easy to leave out without it being obvious on the page, and they often come back as extra costs. Also check that each line has a quantity and a unit.
When do extra costs usually appear?
Most often when pages or features are added after the design is agreed, when design revisions exceed the agreed number, when copy and images have to be migrated by hand, when redirects or translations are added just before launch, and when post-launch changes fall outside the care plan. Agree how changes will be priced and approved before signing.
Does a Japanese company pay Dutch VAT (BTW) when hiring a Dutch agency?
The Dutch Tax Administration says many services supplied to businesses outside the EU are taxed in the customer's country and are not included in the Dutch VAT return. There are exceptions depending on the service, and Japanese consumption tax must be checked separately. Confirm with a tax adviser before signing.

Planning a site that has to work in both markets?

Get in touch

Contents